Just came across this today... thoughts? Curious what the hive mind has to say.
Again, show me the results.I think the concern over dry starting is unnecessary.
Well, we have engines that are dry started easily lasting 200,000 miles with the typical slapdash maintenance, and plenty of examples of 1,000,000 mile engines.Again, show me the results.
No, I mean a control engine with 200k an a test engine with the modified adapter. I'm just curious as to the diffence in wearWell, we have engines that are dry started easily lasting 200,000 miles with the typical slapdash maintenance, and plenty of examples of 1,000,000 mile engines.
I don't think anyone has done this or is likely to. But, this is a question that was discussed here recently, and I asked our Mechanical Engineering PhD kid about it. He said there will be a difference in wear in the lab (which makes sense) but in the real world it will be totally inconsequential.No, I mean a control engine with 200k an a test engine with the modified adapter. I'm just curious as to the diffence in wear
That was slightly different, but kind of the same topic with "dry starts". I questionI don't think anyone has done this or is likely to. But, this is a question that was discussed here recently, and I asked our Mechanical Engineering PhD kid about it. He said there will be a difference in wear in the lab (which makes sense) but in the real world it will be totally inconsequential.
I don't think you're being cynical. There are TONS of products on the market that make no difference, not even theoretically, and people buy them.That was slightly different, but kind of the same topic with "dry starts". I question
specifically whether this mod would make any difference in wear. I agree I don't think anybody's going to spend the money to do the research when they can just make the money by selling the product. Okay, maybe I'm a little cynical