Forums
New posts
Search forums
Image search
Shop
Amazon Store
T-Shirts
Stickers
Members
Current visitors
Supporting Member Upgrade
Sponsors
About
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Image search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Jeep Wrangler JK
JK General Discussion
Easter Has anyone found the famous "Easter Egg" on their JK?
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dirty Dog" data-source="post: 459188" data-attributes="member: 24042"><p>And they're kind of cool cosmetic touches.</p><p></p><p>It's worth pointing out, though, that low profile tires <strong><em>CAN </em></strong> have a negative impact on the Jeeps functionality. Wranglers, in particular, are designed from day one to be the most capable off-highway vehicle you can buy. Low profile tires reduce this capability. On a Trackhawk, They're a good idea. If your idea of a cool Wrangler includes low profile tires, cool. But when people put them on and come here asking about off-roading, I'll certainly be one of those who suggests getting more appropriate wheels and tires.</p><p></p><p>Angry eyes are 100% cosmetic. I have them, my wife does not. Zero impact on function.</p><p></p><p>It's a fine vehicle for what it was designed to be. But it's a change from the "normal" Jeep design school, so it gets a lot of hate. Remember the haters when the YJ was released? There are still people who insist that the lack of round headlights prevent it from being a "real" Jeep.</p><p></p><p>Radical design changes get hate, but the haters sometimes live to regret it. Dealers used to strip the nose cones and wings off Plymouth Superbirds and Dodge Charger Daytonas and sell them as base models, or leave them on and sell them at a steep discount. Because they were too outrageous for the general population.</p><p></p><p>Last year, an original 1970 426 Hemi Superbird was auctioned for $1,650,000. They're looking pretty good right now...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dirty Dog, post: 459188, member: 24042"] And they're kind of cool cosmetic touches. It's worth pointing out, though, that low profile tires [B][I]CAN [/I][/B] have a negative impact on the Jeeps functionality. Wranglers, in particular, are designed from day one to be the most capable off-highway vehicle you can buy. Low profile tires reduce this capability. On a Trackhawk, They're a good idea. If your idea of a cool Wrangler includes low profile tires, cool. But when people put them on and come here asking about off-roading, I'll certainly be one of those who suggests getting more appropriate wheels and tires. Angry eyes are 100% cosmetic. I have them, my wife does not. Zero impact on function. It's a fine vehicle for what it was designed to be. But it's a change from the "normal" Jeep design school, so it gets a lot of hate. Remember the haters when the YJ was released? There are still people who insist that the lack of round headlights prevent it from being a "real" Jeep. Radical design changes get hate, but the haters sometimes live to regret it. Dealers used to strip the nose cones and wings off Plymouth Superbirds and Dodge Charger Daytonas and sell them as base models, or leave them on and sell them at a steep discount. Because they were too outrageous for the general population. Last year, an original 1970 426 Hemi Superbird was auctioned for $1,650,000. They're looking pretty good right now... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Jeep Wrangler JK
JK General Discussion
Easter Has anyone found the famous "Easter Egg" on their JK?
Top
Bottom